python subprocess no wait
Use subprocess.Popen instead of subprocess.call : process = subprocess.Popen(['foo', '-b', 'bar']). , Just don't call myProc.communicate() if you don't want to wait. subprocess.Popen will start the process.
| 相關軟體 Python (64-bit) 資訊 | |
|---|---|
 python subprocess no wait 相關參考資料
Run Process and Don't Wait - Stack Overflow
This call doesn't wait for the child process to terminate (on Linux). ... I looked at the the documentation of subprocess, and I believe the important aspect for ... I'm running "Python 2... https://stackoverflow.com Can subprocess.call be invoked without waiting for process to ...
Use subprocess.Popen instead of subprocess.call : process = subprocess.Popen(['foo', '-b', 'bar']). https://stackoverflow.com Python subprocess.popen() without waiting - Stack Overflow
Just don't call myProc.communicate() if you don't want to wait. subprocess.Popen will start the process. https://stackoverflow.com how to call a program from python without waiting for it to return ...
By using poll() instead of wait() on Popen it will not block and it won't wait for the program to run. However, I think the only way to really stop the entire program ... https://stackoverflow.com Send input to python subprocess without waiting for result - Stack ...
You are using the wrong tool here with communicate which waits for the end of the program. You should simply feed the standard input of the ... https://stackoverflow.com Python create a subprocess and do not wait - Stack Overflow
You can also use the Threading module of python if you are using ... form a few days ago: Stop a background process in flask without creating zombie processes. https://stackoverflow.com Use subprocess.communicate() to pipe stdin without waiting for ...
Even though Python closes the temporary file when the with block exits (which ... To write data to stdin without needing to wait for the subprocess to complete. https://stackoverflow.com Python subprocess.call not waiting for process to finish blender ...
Because of this Python thinks that your script is done, the PID is gone. If I were you I would do this: ... subprocess.run will by default wait for the process to finish. https://stackoverflow.com |