mere puff
1. MERE PUFFS. For the purposes of attracting custom, tradesmen may make vague exaggerated claims in adverts. Such statements are ...,A mere puff is a statement often associated with advertising. Another way of explaining this is “salesman's hype” or hyperbole. These are statements that plainly ...
| 相關軟體 Mumble 資訊 | |
|---|---|
 mere puff 相關參考資料
How to distinguish misrepresentation from 'mere puff' - Quora
A “mere puff”is a piece of exaggerated salesman's flannel which is not intended to be relied upon. . As for distinguishing between them, it depend ... https://www.quora.com Intention Law Lecture Notes - Law Teacher
1. MERE PUFFS. For the purposes of attracting custom, tradesmen may make vague exaggerated claims in adverts. Such statements are ... https://www.lawteacher.net Law (LLB) Lecture Notes: Law of Contract - Terms in a ...
A mere puff is a statement often associated with advertising. Another way of explaining this is “salesman's hype” or hyperbole. These are statements that plainly ... http://llbnotes.blogspot.com Mere puffs Mere puffs are statements which are so vague that ...
Mere puffs: Mere puffs are statements which are so vague that they have no effect inlaw. To describe the land as “fertile and improvable” is a mere puff. https://www.coursehero.com Puffery - Wikipedia
Part of their defence was that such a statement was "mere puff" and not meant to be taken seriously. While the defence ultimately lost the case, the principle was ... https://en.wikipedia.org The Issue Of Mere Puff - 1545 Words | Bartleby
Free Essay: QUESTION 1) Mere Puff is an announcement, which by its tendency, and in the setting in which it is made, is not expected to have lawful... https://www.bartleby.com 係法律上，咩叫mere puff？ - 香港討論區discuss.com.hk
Mere Puff is a statement, which by its nature, and in the context in ... If a term is just a representation (or mere puff) the remedies are going to be ... https://www.discuss.com.hk 商人一般都會用 糊及誇張的手法它們只是說說而已mere puff ...
上 訴 庭 支持 原 審 法 官 的決定，認為此等家庭協議只是 mere puff ， 講吓啫 ， 毋 須 負 法律責任。上 訴 人並 未 能 提 出有利 證 據 証 明相反 意圖。 但 假 如 两 ... https://www.coursehero.com 演說1306A簡明合約法| 掌門天地
它們只是“說說而已mere puff”，無意有法律約束性，已成定例。 Weeks v. Tybald, 1605被告向未來女婿說：「你娶我個女，我給你￡100。」法庭 ... https://www.tangsbookclub.com |